Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
News Release
March 18, 2025

Guttmacher Institute Joins Amicus Brief Calling on the US Supreme Court to Affirm Medicaid Patients’ Access to Their Preferred Provider

Amicus brief emphasizes importance of access to qualified reproductive health care providers such as Planned Parenthood South Atlantic

The Guttmacher Institute has joined an amicus brief calling on the US Supreme Court to affirm that Medicaid recipients are entitled to seek health care from a qualified provider of their choosing and that they can go to court if they are denied that right. Medicaid is the largest source of public health insurance in the country and has long helped expand access to sexual and reproductive health care and other vital health services.

On April 2, the Supreme Court will hear Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, a case addressing whether Medicaid’s “any qualified provider” provision allows Medicaid recipients to see the health care provider of their choosing. Specifically, this case is about whether patients can challenge in court South Carolina’s efforts to block them from accessing contraceptive care, STI testing and treatment, cancer screening and other care at Planned Parenthood South Atlantic.

“This is yet another targeted attempt to ‘defund’ Planned Parenthood and block Medicaid beneficiaries from seeing this critical provider of sexual and reproductive health services, but it is also about so much more than that,” says Destiny Lopez, Co-President and CEO of the Guttmacher Institute. “The anti-abortion movement is once again seeking to control people’s bodily autonomy by attempting to dictate which providers you can and can’t see. Everyone should have the freedom to access high-quality, affordable health care from the provider of their choosing—and the Supreme Court must affirm this critical protection within the Medicaid program.” 

Excerpt from amicus brief: 

“South Carolina’s actions will impose particularly significant barriers to health care for communities of color, people with disabilities, LGBTQ+ people, and others who have been excluded from social, economic, and political power. Systemic discrimination informs how these individuals interact with the healthcare system, and makes access to a trusted, freely-chosen provider even more essential. Terminating Planned Parenthood from South Carolina’s Medicaid program will result in harms to reproductive health that fall most heavily on those who have long been denied the opportunity to exercise decision-making about their bodies, families, and lives... 

“The Medicaid program has dramatically expanded access to health care through public insurance that millions of people rely upon to build healthy lives and families. The ‘free-choice-of-provider provision’—and the access to high-quality, comprehensive sexual and reproductive health care providers that it facilitates—has made Medicaid a crucial resource for people with low incomes across the United States.” 

Printer-friendly version

Share

Read More

Resource

Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe

Report

Publicly Supported Family Planning Clinics in 2022–2023: Trends in Service Delivery Practices and Protocols

Report

Any Restrictions on Reproductive Health Care Harm Reproductive Autonomy: Evidence from Four States

Media Contact

  • Media Office

    Guttmacher Institute
    media@guttmacher.org

Topic

United States

  • Abortion: Insurance Coverage
  • Contraception: Publicly Funded Family Planning

Region

  • Northern America: United States

Tags

Medicaid, Supreme Court (SCOTUS)
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.