Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Policy Analysis
May 2020

It’s Time for Congress to Give All Young People the Sexual Health Resources They Need to Thrive

Authors

Leah H. Keller, Guttmacher Institute

Reproductive rights are under attack. Will you help us fight back with facts?

Donate

All young people deserve high-quality sex education and sexual health care, yet not all of them have access to these vital resources. The current landscape of sexual health for young people has been shaped by years of stigma around adolescent sexuality and the Trump administration’s dismissal of young people’s sexual health needs. However, Congress has the ability to make sexual health information and services more accessible for adolescents and young adults.

In 2019, federal lawmakers reintroduced two complementary bills—the Real Education for Healthy Youth Act (REHYA) and the Youth Access to Sexual Health Services Act (YASHS)—that would address this need by expanding the sexual health information and services that are available to young people. REHYA would ensure funding for comprehensive sex education programs, while YASHS would primarily support access to sexual and reproductive health care and related services. Both focus on groups that have been historically marginalized in social, economic and medical settings: young people of color, LGBTQ+ youth, immigrants and adolescents in juvenile detention, among others. These bills offer alternatives to the abstinence-only programs that the Trump administration has been promoting since coming to office.

The COVID-19 pandemic starkly demonstrates the importance of access to public health information and affordable health care services for all. It is critical to equip people with tools to understand and address their health needs so that in times of crisis—whether a global challenge like the COVID-19 pandemic or a personal emergency—those needs will not be neglected.

Both bills address young people’s sexual health needs by centering medically accurate and complete information, inclusive and age-appropriate information and services, and healthy communication and relationships. Although some states’ sex education laws already reflect these principles, federal leadership is still necessary, as:

  • 24 states do not require sex education to be age appropriate
  • 29 states do not require sex education to cover healthy relationships
  • 33 states and the District of Columbia do not require sex education to be medically accurate
  • 41 states do not require sex education to be culturally appropriate and unbiased

The inadequacy of abstinence-only curricula and the importance of culturally appropriate, age-appropriate and medically accurate sex education that discusses healthy relationships is recognized by multiple provider groups. Experts at the American Medical Association, Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists acknowledge young people’s sexual activity and their right to sexual health, and support sex education programs that include these principles. Their positions align with evidence suggesting that comprehensive approaches to sex education help young people have healthy and responsible relationships. On the flip side, abstinence-only programs do nothing to prepare young people for when they do become sexually active, and systematically ignore the needs of those who are already having sex.

Real Education for Healthy Youth Act

This bill would establish the first federal grants for comprehensive sex education programs and eliminate funding for the harmful Title V abstinence-only-until-marriage program. The new grants would fund curricula that support the sexual health and agency of young people by providing tools to help them make decisions that best fit their needs. The grants would go to high schools, colleges and organizations that focus on adolescents’ health.

REHYA would require program grantees to offer culturally and developmentally appropriate instruction on physical, social and emotional development; contraceptive use, abstinence and sexual decision making; and gender equity, among other topics. The bill would also fund professional development for sex education teachers in elementary and middle schools.

The sex education programs funded through this bill represent a step forward for federal funding streams that are not dedicated solely to abstinence-only programs. The existing Personal Responsibility Education Program provides grants to states for programs that educate adolescents about abstinence and the use of contraception to prevent pregnancy and STIs. The Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program (TPPP) is a grant program for community-based groups to support evidence-based and innovative teen pregnancy prevention approaches. Currently, neither program directly supports comprehensive sex education programs, and in recent years, the Trump administration has sought to shift TPPP toward an abstinence-only approach.

Youth Access to Sexual Health Services Act

YASHS would create competitive grants to provide sexual health services to people younger than 26 who are disadvantaged because of underlying structural barriers or social inequities, including young people of color, immigrants and LGBTQ+ youth. State and local health agencies, public schools, nonprofit organizations, hospitals, and Indian tribes and tribal organizations are eligible for grants under YASHS.

Funds authorized by this bill would be used to provide sexual health information, promote effective sexual health communication among young people, support the health and economic opportunities of school-aged parents, and offer training to people who work with young people to promote the prevention of STIs and unintended pregnancies. Funds could not go to entities that withhold "health-promoting or life-saving information" (including abstinence-only programs), promote gender stereotypes, or are insensitive or unresponsive to the needs of young people who are LGBTQ+, sexually active, pregnant or parenting, survivors of sexual abuse or assault, or who have physical, developmental or mental disabilities.

Creating New Opportunities for Young People

The Trump administration has demonstrated time and again its allegiance to abstinence-only programs and hostility toward people with low incomes, LGBTQ+ people and immigrants and their ability to access health care. By funding comprehensive sex education and sexual health services for underserved groups, these bills push back against the administration’s bigoted agenda and recognize the right to sexual health for all young people.

First published online: May 27, 2020

Share

Printer-friendly version

Read More

State Laws and Policies

Sex Education and HIV Education

Policy Analysis

Reducing STI Cases: Young People Deserve Better Sexual Health Information and Services

Guttmacher Policy Review
Policy Analysis

Expanding the Scope of Sex Education and the Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program: A Work in Progress

Policy Analysis

State Lawmakers Say Yes to Consent Education

Policy Analysis

State and Federal Lawmakers Promote Sexual Consent, LGBTQ+ Inclusivity in Sex Education

Policy Analysis

New Name, Same Harm: Rebranding of Federal Abstinence-Only Programs

Guttmacher Policy Review
Policy Analysis

The Looming Threat to Sex Education: A Resurgence of Federal Funding for Abstinence-Only Programs?

Guttmacher Policy Review

Topic

United States

Global

  • Teens: Comprehensive Sexuality Education

Geography

  • Northern America: United States

Tags

adolescents, sex education

US Policy Resources

More
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.