Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Guttmacher Policy Review

  1. August 2000 Policy Analysis

    High Court Strikes Down 'Partial-Birth' Ban, Upholds Protections for Clinic Clients

    Guttmacher Policy Review
  2. June 2001 Policy Analysis

    Global Gag Rule: Exporting Antiabortion Ideology at the Expense of American Values

    Susan A. Cohen Guttmacher Policy Review
  3. May 2002 Policy Analysis

    Hierarchy Crackdown Clouds Future of Sterilization, EC Provision at Catholic Hospitals

    Rachel Benson Gold Guttmacher Policy Review
  4. August 2005 Policy Analysis

    Rights vs. Responsibilities: Professional Standards and Provider Refusals

    Adam Sonfield Guttmacher Policy Review
  5. March 2007 Policy Analysis

    Lessons for Family Planning Providers from Transitions In Maternal and Child Health Funding

    Rachel Benson Gold Guttmacher Policy Review
  6. April 1999 Policy Analysis

    State Efforts to Expand Medicaid-Funded Family Planning Show Promise

    Rachel Benson Gold Guttmacher Policy Review
  7. February 2000 Policy Analysis

    California's Expansion Of Medicaid Family Planning Approved

    Guttmacher Policy Review
  8. October 2000 Policy Analysis

    Abortion Surfaces As Key Issue in Mexican Politics

    Guttmacher Policy Review
  9. May 2007 Policy Analysis

    Institute of Medicine: Abstinence Education Spending Requirement Hinders International Response to HIV/AIDS

    Guttmacher Policy Review
  10. March 2009 Policy Analysis

    Reclaiming the Lead: Restoring U.S. Leadership in Global Sexual and Reproductive Health Policy

    Sneha Barot Guttmacher Policy Review
  11. December 2003 Policy Analysis

    Beyond Slogans: Lessons From Uganda's Experience With ABC and HIV/AIDS

    Susan A. Cohen Guttmacher Policy Review
  12. June 1998 Policy Analysis

    What's Behind the Antiabortion Campaign Over 'Fungibility'?

    Susan A. Cohen Guttmacher Policy Review
  13. October 1999 Policy Analysis

    DHHS Rewards Four States, D.C. for Reducing Nonmarital Births

    Guttmacher Policy Review
  14. June 2000 Policy Analysis

    Adolescent Care Standards Provide Guidance for State CHIP Programs

    Rachel Benson Gold Guttmacher Policy Review
  15. February 2005 Policy Analysis

    Reproductive Health Advocates and Marriage Promotion: Asserting a Stake in the Debate

    Cynthia Dailard Guttmacher Policy Review

Pagination

  • First page First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Current page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • Page 10
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.®

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.