Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Guttmacher Policy Review

  1. June 2000 Policy Analysis

    Adolescent Care Standards Provide Guidance for State CHIP Programs

    Rachel Benson Gold Guttmacher Policy Review
  2. February 2005 Policy Analysis

    Reproductive Health Advocates and Marriage Promotion: Asserting a Stake in the Debate

    Cynthia Dailard Guttmacher Policy Review
  3. February 2008 Policy Analysis

    Toward Universal Insurance Coverage: A Primer for Sexual and Reproductive Health Advocates

    Adam Sonfield Guttmacher Policy Review
  4. May 2003 Policy Analysis

    Marriage Is No Immunity From Problems with Planning Pregnancies

    Cynthia Dailard Guttmacher Policy Review
  5. February 1999 Policy Analysis

    The United States and the United Nations Population Fund: A Rocky Relationship

    Susan A. Cohen Guttmacher Policy Review
  6. December 1999 Policy Analysis

    Appeals Courts Differ Over State 'Partial Birth' Abortion Bans

    Guttmacher Policy Review
  7. August 2000 Policy Analysis

    Title X 'Gag Rule' Is Formally Repealed

    Guttmacher Policy Review
  8. August 2001 Policy Analysis

    Increased Awareness Needed To Reach Full Potential Of Emergency Contraception

    Cynthia Dailard Guttmacher Policy Review
  9. August 2005 Policy Analysis

    Beyond the Issue of Pharmacist Refusals: Pharmacies That Won't Sell Emergency Contraception

    Cynthia Dailard Guttmacher Policy Review
  10. March 2007 Policy Analysis

    The Impact of Anti-Immigrant Policy on Publicly Subsidized Reproductive Health Care

    Adam Sonfield Guttmacher Policy Review
  11. August 2008 Policy Analysis

    Back to Basics: The Rationale for Increased Funds for International Family Planning

    Sneha Barot Guttmacher Policy Review
  12. June 2010 Policy Analysis

    Contraception: An Integral Component of Preventive Care for Women

    Adam Sonfield Guttmacher Policy Review
  13. August 2003 Policy Analysis

    States Eye Medicaid Cuts As Cure for Fiscal Woes

    Rachel Benson Gold Guttmacher Policy Review
  14. June 1999 Policy Analysis

    Objections, Confusion Among Pharmacists Threaten Access To Emergency Contraception

    Susan A. Cohen Guttmacher Policy Review
  15. February 2000 Policy Analysis

    DHHS Cites Impact Of Family Planning, Sets Goals for 2010

    Guttmacher Policy Review

Pagination

  • First page First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • Current page 10
  • Page 11
  • Page 12
  • Page 13
  • Page 14
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.®

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.