Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Report
March 2012

Health Information Technology and Publicly Funded Family Planning Agencies: Readiness, Use and Challenges

Author(s)

Jennifer J. Frost, Jenna Jerman and Adam Sonfield

Reproductive rights are under attack. Will you help us fight back with facts?

Donate

Key Points

Key Points

• The types of health information technology (HIT) that are most widely used by publicly funded family planning agencies are those that accomplish agency management tasks, most commonly third-party billing (75%). Only about half of agencies report current use of electronic health records (EHRs) for electronic entry of clinical notes (49%), and far fewer agencies provide patients with online access to scheduling (21%) or medical records (12%).

• Federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) report the highest current use of HIT when compared with other types of family planning agencies. Planned Parenthood affiliates and other agencies (including hospital-based agencies) fall somewhat below FQHCs, and health department agencies report comparatively little current use of HIT.

• Most agencies report that they are prepared for HIT implementation in terms of having internet connectivity (73%) and the necessary IT infrastructure and support (57–59%). Fewer than half report being prepared in terms of their staff’s IT experience and literacy and their capacity to conduct necessary staff training (39–47%). FQHCs report being the most prepared to implement HIT systems and health departments are the least prepared.

• The top three barriers to successfully adopting and utilizing HIT are financial: implementation costs (cited by 67% of agencies), ongoing costs (62%) and acquisition costs (58%). Other common challenges include identifying or building an appropriate EHR system (37%) and obtaining necessary IT support and expertise (34%). Health departments are the most likely to report that many aspects of HIT implementation were problematic, and FQHCs are the least likely to report such challenges.

• Large proportions of agencies report a need for five different types of technical assistance: training (68%), conversion from paper to electronic records (58%), implementation and project management (57%), customization to ensure patient confidentiality (55%) and readiness assessment and project planning (52%).

• More than three-quarters of agencies report that some or all of their service delivery sites bill at least 30% of client encounters to Medicaid, indicating that they would have clinicians eligible for a Medicaid program that provides incentive payments for adopting and using EHRs.

Share

Download Report

Topic

United States

  • Contraception: Publicly Funded Family Planning

Geography

  • Northern America: United States
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.