Skip to main content

Guttmacher Institute

Donate Now

Highlights

  • COVID-19 impact
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • IPSRH: Focus on Abortion
  • Adding It Up
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • U.S. policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • U.S.

Articles

  • Global research
  • U.S. research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Op-eds & external blogs

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • U.S.
  • U.S. State Laws and Policies

Data & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Infographics

Peer-Reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

U.S.

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work By Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Oceania
  • United States

Who We Are

  • About us
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Donate stock or securites
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Annual Report

Awards and Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship

Search form

Good reproductive health policy starts with credible research

 

Connect With Us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Email
Guttmacher Institute

Good reproductive health policy starts with credible research

 

Donate Now

Connect With Us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Email

Highlights

  • COVID-19 impact
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • IPSRH: Focus on Abortion
  • Adding It Up
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • U.S. policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • U.S.

Articles

  • Global research
  • U.S. research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Op-eds & external blogs

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • U.S.
  • U.S. State Laws and Policies

Data & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Infographics

Peer-Reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

U.S.

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work By Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Oceania
  • United States

Who We Are

  • About us
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Donate stock or securites
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Annual Report

Awards and Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship

Search form

As of April 1, 2021 State Laws and Policies

Substance Use During Pregnancy

Background

Since the late 1980s, policymakers have debated the question of how society should deal with the problem of women’s substance use during pregnancy. Prosecutors have attempted to rely on a host of criminal laws already on the books to attack prenatal substance use. The Supreme Courts in Alabama and South Carolina have upheld convictions ruling that a woman’s substance use in pregnancy constitutes criminal child abuse. Meanwhile, several states have expanded their civil child-welfare requirements to include prenatal substance use, so that prenatal drug exposure can provide grounds for terminating parental rights because of child abuse or neglect. Further, some states, under the rubric of protecting the fetus, authorize civil commitment (such as forced admission to an inpatient treatment program) of pregnant women who use drugs; these policies sometimes also apply to alcohol use or other behaviors. A number of states require health care professionals to report or test for prenatal drug exposure, which can be used as evidence in child-welfare proceedings. And in order to receive federal child abuse prevention funds, states must require health care providers to notify child protective services when the provider cares for an infant affected by illegal substance use. Finally, a number of states have placed a priority on making drug treatment more readily available to pregnant women, which is bolstered by federal funds that require pregnant women receive priority access to programs.

Visit our state legislation tracker for policy activity on all sexual and reproductive health topics.

Highlights

  • 23 states and the District of Columbia consider substance use during pregnancy to be child abuse under civil child-welfare statutes, and 3 consider it grounds for civil commitment.
  • 25 states and the District of Columbia require health care professionals to report suspected prenatal drug use, and 8 states require them to test for prenatal drug exposure if they suspect drug use.
  • 19 states have either created or funded drug treatment programs specifically targeted to pregnant women, and 17 states and the District of Columbia provide pregnant women with priority access to state-funded drug treatment programs.
  • 10 states prohibit publicly funded drug treatment programs from discriminating against pregnant women.
Printer-friendly version

For more information

  • Public Policy Office

    202 296-4012
    [email protected]

Topic

United States

  • Pregnancy: State Policies on Pregnancy

Geography

  • United States: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming

Related Content

Policy Analysis

State Responses to Substance Abuse Among Pregnant Women

Guttmacher Policy Review
Policy Analysis

Concerns Mount over Punitive Approaches to Substance Abuse Among Pregnant Women

Guttmacher Policy Review

State Policies on Substance Use During Pregnancy

 

 

 

 

SUBSTANCE USE DURING PREGNANCY CONSIDERED:

WHEN DRUG USE DIAGNOSED OR SUSPECTED, STATE REQUIRES:

DRUG TREATMENT FOR PREGNANT WOMEN

STATE

Child Abuse

Grounds for Civil Commitment

Reporting

Testing

Targeted Program Created

Pregnant Women Given Priority Access in General Programs

Pregnant Women Protected from Discrimination in Publicly Funded Programs

Alabama

X*

 

 

 

 

X

X

Alaska

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

Arizona

X

 

X

 

 

X

 

Arkansas

X

 

X

 

X

X

 

California

 

 

X

 

X

 

 

Colorado

X

 

 

 

Xξ​

 

 

Connecticut

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

Delaware

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

District of Columbia

X

 

X

 

 

X

 

Florida

X

 

 

 

X

 

X

Georgia

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

Illinois

X

 

X

 

Xξ​

X

X

Indiana

X†​

 

 

X

X

 

 

Iowa

X

 

X

X

 

X

X

Kansas

 

 

 

 

 

X

X

Kentucky

 X

 

X

X

X

X

X

Louisiana

X

 

X

X

 

 

 

Maine

 

 

X

 

 

X

 

Maryland

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

Massachusetts

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

Michigan

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

Minnesota

X

X

X

X

X

 

 

Missouri

XΩ​

 

 

 

ξ

X‡​

X

Montana

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

Nebraska

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

Nevada

X

 

X

 

 

 

 

New York

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

North Carolina

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

North Dakota

X

 

X

X

 

 

 

Ohio

 X

 

X

 

 Xξ​

X 

X

Oklahoma

 

 

X

 

 

X

X

Oregon

 

 

 

 

ξ

 

 

Pennsylvania

 

 

X

 

X

 

 

Rhode Island

X

 

X

X

 

 

 

South Carolina

X*

 

 

 

X

 

 

South Dakota

X

X

 X

 X

 

 

 

Tennessee

 

 

 

 

Xξ​

X

X

Texas

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

Utah

X

 

X

 

 

X

 

Virginia

X

 

X

 

Xξ

 

 

Washington

X

 

 

 

Xξ

 

 

West Virginia

 

 

 

 

 

XӨ​

 

Wisconsin

X

X

X

 

X

Xᵝ

 

TOTAL

23+DC

3

25+DC

8

19

17+DC

10

 

*  The Alabama Supreme Court held that drug use while pregnant is considered chemical endangerment of a child. The South Carolina Supreme Court held that a viable fetus is a "person" under the state's criminal child-endangerment statute and that "maternal acts endangering or likely to endanger the life, comfort, or health of a viable fetus" constitute criminal child abuse.
†  Indiana law prohibits a medical provider from releasing information about a pregnant woman's drug or alcohol test without her consent.
‡  Priority applies to pregnant women referred for treatment.
ξ  Establishes requirements for health care providers to encourage and facilitate drug counseling.
Ω Missouri child abuse law considers a parent to be unfit if the woman tests positive for substances within 8 hours after delivery and she has previously been convicted of child abuse or neglect or if she failed to complete a drug treatment program recommended by Child Protective Services.
Ө West Virginia substance use providers that accept Medicaid must give pregnant women priority in accessing services.
β  Wisconsin provides priority access to pregnant women in both general and private programs.

 

 

Get updates on policy issues and more

Sign up for Guttmacher updates

Get the latest research and policy analyses on sexual and reproductive health and rights around the world.

Subscribe
Guttmacher Institute
Reproductive rights are under attack. Will you help us fight back with facts?
Donate Now
Follow Guttmacher:

Connect With Us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn

Footer Menu

  • Privacy Policy
© 2021 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.

Get Our Updates