Image
2X MATCH: Stop Attacks on Bodily Autonomy. The fight for reproductive freedom has never been more urgent. Thanks to a limited-time 2X match offer, your gift today will have TWICE the impact. Help power critical research and policy advocacy to protect and advance reproductive health care worldwide. Double My Impact.
Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Policy Analysis
October 2005

Reproductive health in the state legislatures, January – September 2005

Reproductive rights are under attack. Will you help us fight back with facts?

Donate

By the beginning of October, nearly all of the state legislatures have adjourned for 2005 (only seven remain in session), and in their wake, they leave numerous new laws affecting access to and availability of reproductive health services. To date, a total of 80 laws have been enacted, compared with 28 for all of 2005.

So far this year, 43 measures that restrict access to reproductive health care have been enacted (up from 16 last year), including measures that

  • criminalize abortion in the event Roe v. Wade is overturned (South Dakota);
  • require women to receive counseling at least 24 hours before having an abortion (Georgia, Louisiana, Oklahoma and South Dakota);
  • provide women seeking an abortion with scientifically unsupported information on fetal pain (Arkansas, Georgia and Minnesota);
  • require minors seeking an abortion to obtain parental consent (Arkansas, Idaho and Texas) or give parental notice (Florida, Georgia, Oklahoma and South Dakota);
  • penalize those assisting a minor in crossing state lines for an abortion (Missouri);
  • fund organizations that provide "alternatives to abortion" counseling and services for pregnant women (Florida, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Dakota, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Texas); and
  • exclude agencies that provide abortion-related services from participating in state family planning programs (Ohio, Pennsylvania and Texas).

On the other hand, 20 measures designed to increase access to reproductive health care have been approved this year (compared with 3 last year), including measures that

  • permit pharmacists to dispense emergency contraceptives without a prescription (Massachusetts and New Hampshire);
  • provide sexual assault victims with services related to emergency contraception (Massachusetts, New Jersey and Texas);
  • expand Medicaid eligibility for family planning (Connecticut, Indiana and Texas);
  • protect access to contraceptives by limiting pharmacist refusals (California);
  • require coverage of contraception within insurance plans (Arkansas and West Virginia); and
  • protect access to abortion clinics (Montana).

In addition, other measures were enacted that would

  • consider a fetus a person under homicide statutes (Arizona, Florida, Maryland, Oklahoma and West Virginia);
  • provide enhanced penalties for killing a pregnant woman (Maine); and
  • allow stem cell research (Connecticut, Indiana and Massachusetts).

Parental involvement in minors’ abortions has also been a hot issue this year in the states. To date, eight states—Arkansas, Idaho, Florida, Georgia, Missouri, Oklahoma, South Dakota and Texas—have passed or amended parental involvement laws this year. Missouri’s new law, which is blocked pending the resolution of a court case, would prohibit anyone from helping a minor obtain an out-of-state abortion. In addition, after seven years in legal limbo, Ohio’s parental consent law, although still being challenged, was allowed to go into effect and replace the existing parental notification law.

The question of parental involvement is likely to remain in the news. The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear the case of New Hampshire’s enjoined parental notification law during this year’s term. And the question of whether a parent must be notified before an abortion is performed on a minor is up for vote in California’s upcoming special election (see Teenagers’ Access to Confidential Reproductive Health Services).

Click on the links below for more information.

Monthly updates on sexual and reproductive health and rights developments in the states

The current status of state policies

Receive e-mail updates on state-oriented research and analysis by subscribing to State News Quarterly.

First published online: October 18, 2005

Share

Printer-friendly version

Tags

State Policy Trends

US Policy Resources

More
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.