This fact sheet summarizes findings for Madhya Pradesh from a 2015 study that provides the first comprehensive estimates of the incidence of abortion and unintended pregnancy in six states in India.
Incidence of abortion and unintended pregnancy
- Induced abortion has been legal in India on a broad range of grounds since the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act was passed in 1971.*
- An estimated 1.11 million abortions are performed in Madhya Pradesh annually. For 2015, this translates to 57 abortions per 1,000 women of reproductive age (15–49).
- Twenty-five percent of abortions occurring annually in the state—an estimated 282,500—are provided in health facilities. Fifty-seven percent of these are surgical and 43% are performed using medical methods of abortion (MMA).† About two-thirds of facility-based abortions are provided in private facilities, 27% in public facilities and roughly 6% in NGO facilities.
- The majority of abortions in Madhya Pradesh (69%) are done using MMA obtained in settings other than health facilities. Five percent are performed outside of health facilities using other, typically unsafe methods.
- An estimated 50% of all pregnancies in the state—1.7 million in 2015—are unintended. Nearly two-thirds (65%) of unintended pregnancies end in abortion.
- About 559,500 women obtain facility-based postabortion care for complications resulting from induced abortion or miscarriage each year in Madhya Pradesh.
- The majority of women receiving postabortion care are treated for minor complications, such as incomplete abortion from MMA or prolonged or abnormal bleeding, and many of these women likely seek care unnecessarily because they mistake the normal process of MMA for a complication.
- An important minority of postabortion care patients experience one or more severe complication, such as infection (10%), physical injury (3%), sepsis (3%) or shock (2%). These complications are most likely the result of nonfacility abortions using methods other than MMA.
Provision of abortion-related care in health facilities
- As of 2015, an estimated 4,427 facilities in Madhya Pradesh provide abortion-related care (induced abortion, postabortion care or both); 29% are public and 71% are private (including NGOs).
- Among facilities offering any abortion-related care, about 58% provide both induced abortion and postabortion care, 34% offer only postabortion care and nearly 9% offer only abortion.
- The large majority (70%) of public facilities offer some abortion-related care: 99% of hospitals and 100% of community health centres but only 51% of primary health centres.
- Although 69% of women in Madhya Pradesh reside in rural areas, just 21% of facilities offering abortion-related services are located in these areas.
Types of abortions provided in facilities
- The vast majority (87%) of facility-based abortions take place in the first trimester of pregnancy (up to 12 weeks’ gestation), and 42% occur in the first seven weeks of pregnancy.
- Three-quarters of abortions are performed using the techniques recommended for early termination: manual or electric aspiration (32%) and MMA (43%). Although only 13% of facility-based abortions occur after the first trimester, 25% are performed using more invasive surgical procedures not recommended in the first trimester (dilatation and evacuation or dilatation and curettage).
Barriers to obtaining facility-based abortion
- In Madhya Pradesh, 49% of public facilities that offer any abortion-related services provide only postabortion care. Among these facilities, the most common reasons reported for not offering induced abortion are lack of trained staff and lack of equipment or supplies.
- Unlike public facilities, which are automatically approved to provide induced abortion if they have a certified provider, private facilities must obtain registration before offering that service. Among private facilities offering any abortion-related care, 27% offer only postabortion care; for them, the most common reasons for not providing abortion are lack of trained staff and lack of registration.
- Staff at health facilities cite fear of social stigma as a key barrier preventing women from obtaining safe abortion care. Other such barriers include cost and lack of information about services.
- Moreover, some abortion providers deny women services for reasons that are not in keeping with national abortion guidelines, including because the women are perceived to be too young, are unmarried, do not have children or do not have consent from a family member.
- Improve access to facility-based abortion services, especially in underserved rural areas, by ensuring that all public-sector facilities have adequate equipment and supplies, including MMA drugs.
- Expand the number of providers trained in abortion-related services, for example, by offering MMA training for current and new providers and by amending the MTP Act to allow nurses, auxiliary nurse midwives and practitioners trained in Indian systems of medicine to provide MMA and postabortion care.
- Streamline the process for registering private facilities to offer abortion services by ensuring that District Level Committees are functional, and expand the registration process to include those facilities that are providing MMA only.
- Ensure high-quality abortion care that adheres to national guidelines by training providers in current abortion techniques and best practices, in national abortion laws and in nonjudgmental service provision.
- Use community-based health workers and public health campaigns to educate women about the availability of safe, legal abortion services in facilities, and inform them about the correct use of MMA and the abortion process following its use.
- Improve the quality and availability of voluntary contraceptive services for all women, including those receiving abortion and postabortion services, to help them prevent future unintended pregnancies. Services should include provision of a wide range of methods, counseling on consistent and correct use, and facilitation of method switching.
*Abortion is permitted up to 20 weeks’ gestation when it is necessary to save a woman’s life or protect her physical or mental health, and in cases of economic or social necessity, rape, contraceptive failure among married couples and fetal anomaly.
†In this study, MMA refers to the combined use of misoprostol and mifepristone; tablets may be packaged separately or together in a “combipack.”
The information in this fact sheet can be found in Hussain R et al., Unintended Pregnancy, Abortion and Postabortion Care in Madhya Pradesh, India—2015, New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2018, https://www.guttmacher.org/report/unintended-pregnancy-abortion-postabortion-care-madhya-pradesh-india-2015.
The study on which this fact sheet is based was made possible by grants from the Government of UK Department for International Development (until 2015), the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and the Ford Foundation. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the official policies of the donors.