Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
News Release
September 25, 2025

Guttmacher Scientist Submits Legal Declaration in Support of Case Brought By 22 States and DC to Challenge "Defunding" of Planned Parenthood

Decades of research demonstrate the critical role that Planned Parenthood plays in the publicly supported family planning network

On Wednesday September 24, a coalition of 22 attorneys general and the state of Pennsylvania filed a motion for a preliminary injunction against the Trump administration to block the “defunding” of Planned Parenthood. That policy, which was part of the budget reconciliation bill passed in July, excludes certain health centers, including all those affiliated with Planned Parenthood, from reimbursement through the federal Medicaid program. In support of the coalition’s complaint, Guttmacher Institute Principal Research Scientist Megan L. Kavanaugh, DrPH, submitted a legal declaration, drawing on her expertise regarding contraceptive care and publicly supported family planning services in the United States.

Dr. Kavanaugh’s declaration lays out the comprehensive body of research demonstrating the importance of publicly supported sexual and reproductive health (SRH) care in addressing health inequities and the critical role that Planned Parenthood plays in delivering that care.  

“The research is clear: Planned Parenthood is a vital component of the publicly supported family planning system and defunding these clinics is about politics, not health care,” says Dr. Kavanaugh. “Excluding Planned Parenthood health centers from Medicaid reimbursement will not only disrupt the larger health care system but will severely impact the individuals who rely on this care to live full and healthy lives. As this case makes clear, a person’s right to bodily autonomy should never be dependent on their economic or insurance status.”

The declaration makes several key points:

Medicaid plays a critical role in making contraceptive care affordable

Research shows that cost is a major barrier to SRH care and that people often cease using contraceptives due to an inability to pay. Accordingly, publicly funded clinics are a critical source of SRH care for people who rely on Medicaid and other forms of public insurance. Guttmacher research shows that:

  • In 2023, 21.4% of women aged 15–49 were enrolled in Medicaid, and that proportion went up to 52.8% for women aged 15–49 with incomes below the poverty line.
  • As of 2019, 39% of US women aged 15–44 relied on Medicaid and other public insurance to cover their contraceptive care, and 33% of those obtaining care at publicly supported health care sites used their Medicaid and other public insurance to cover such care.
  • Women with Medicaid coverage or those who were uninsured were more likely than privately insured women (71% and 70% vs. 53%) to report a publicly funded clinic as their usual source of care.

Planned Parenthood is a key provider of publicly supported SRH care

While Planned Parenthood clinics comprise a relatively small proportion of the publicly supported SRH care system overall, they serve an outsized number of patients who receive care from this system. Guttmacher research shows that:

In 2021, one in 10 Medicaid enrollees received their SRH care at a Planned Parenthood clinic.

In 2020, 9,388 publicly supported clinics provided subsidized family planning services nationally and only 6% were Planned Parenthood sites. However, Planned Parenthoods served 33% of the 4.7 million women who obtained contraceptive care from publicly supported clinics that year.  

53% of Planned Parenthood patients relied on Medicaid and other government-funded programs to pay for their care.

Defunding Planned Parenthood will cause significant harm  

Using service data from Planned Parenthood's most recent annual report, Guttmacher quantifies the preventive services offered at Planned Parenthood clinics across the country that are at risk of no longer being provided because of the “defund” provision. According to Guttmacher, these services each year avert:  

  • 82,000 chlamydia infections
  • 9,500 cases of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID)
  • 820 ectopic pregnancies
  • 1600 cases of infertility
  • 130 HIV infections
  • 200 cervical cancer cases

For decades, Guttmacher has tracked the publicly funded family planning landscape, compiling estimates of the number of women who need SRH care, characteristics of these patients, and details on where this care is obtained. The latest data show:

  • In 2020, there were likely 19 million women with a need for publicly supported contraceptive care, yet it is estimated that only 7.2 million received this support.  
  • If Planned Parenthood is unable to serve patients who rely on public insurance, it is unrealistic for other types of facilities in the public health care system to absorb the millions of clients Planned Parenthood serves. To do so, these other facilities would have to increase their contraception caseloads by the following percentages:
    • Federally qualified health center (FQHC) sites by 56%, or an additional one million contraceptive clients per year.  
    • Health department sites by 28%, or an additional 168,000 contraceptive clients per year.  
    • Hospitals by 53%, or an additional 344,000 contraceptive clients per year.  
    • Other sites, such as those operated by independent agencies, by 55%, or an additional 189,000 contraceptive clients per year.  

You can read the full legal declaration here.

Share

Download pdf

Read More

Topic

Contraception in the United States

Opinion

The right is waging a quiet war on contraception

The Hill
News Release

Federally Qualified Health Centers Could Not Readily Replace Planned Parenthood

Statement

Statement from Kelly Baden, Guttmacher Vice President for Public Policy, on Passage of the Budget Reconciliation Bill

Report

Any Restrictions on Reproductive Health Care Harm Reproductive Autonomy: Evidence from Four States

Media Contact

  • Media Office

    Guttmacher Institute
    [email protected]

Topic

United States

  • Contraception

Region

  • Northern America: United States

Tags

Planned Parenthood, Medicaid
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.®

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.