Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Opinion
September 2025

The right is waging a quiet war on contraception

A navy blue background with many types of birth control on display in orange and blue, including an IUD, birth control pills, condoms, and more.

Authors

Amy Friedrich-Karnik, Guttmacher Institute Megan L. Kavanaugh, Guttmacher Institute

Reproductive rights are under attack. Will you help us fight back with facts?

Donate

Access to affordable birth control is being chipped away through a series of incremental policy changes, legal rulings and funding restrictions that are quietly but effectively dismantling the reproductive health care safety net.

While seemingly piecemeal, these actions are part of a coordinated conservative attack on contraceptive access specifically and bodily autonomy more broadly, led by the same anti-abortion forces that helped overturn Roe v. Wade.

Access to contraception has long been a target of conservative lawmakers, but the Trump administration is especially hostile to all forms of sexual and reproductive health care. Look no further than the State Department’s plan to literally burn $9.7 million worth of contraception meant for women in low-income and middle-income countries to realize the war is well underway.

The most recent blow came with the passage of the Republicans’ budget reconciliation bill, which is projected to strip Medicaid coverage from millions of Americans and “defund” Planned Parenthood. Medicaid and Planned Parenthood enable millions to get birth control. For decades, the Guttmacher Institute — where we serve as director of federal policy and principal research scientist — has tracked the effect of public funding on access to contraceptive services, and the critical role that Planned Parenthood plays in helping to deliver that care.

Our research refutes the claim made by conservative lawmakers that federally qualified health centers and hospitals could easily replace Planned Parenthood’s role. These organizations would have to increase their capacity by 56 percent and 28 percent respectively, which would take significant time and investment.

In addition, evidence highlights the higher quality and more specialized contraceptive care provided at Planned Parenthoods as compared to these more generalized sites. The idea that other providers — critically important as they are — can simply “pick up the slack” both in terms of patient load and quality contraceptive care is a dangerous myth perpetrated by policymakers whose top priority is assaulting Planned Parenthood.

The Trump administration’s attack on the Title X family planning program is another front in the war on contraception. By withholding funding from providers that offer or refer for abortions — even though those services are funded separately — they have forced many clinics to close or scale back services. The National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association has documented how these changes have disrupted care for millions, disproportionately affecting people of color, young people and those living in poverty.

And it’s not just Congress and the Trump administration attacking access. In June, the Supreme Court delivered a blow in Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, effectively blocking Medicaid recipients in South Carolina from seeking care at Planned Parenthood and setting a dangerous precedent for other states to follow. Both that ruling and the defund provision passed by Congress mean that many Planned Parenthood clinics would no longer get reimbursed for the care they provide to Medicaid patients, which could force many to close entirely. This could leave Americans who relied on their services without access to care, even those who may be fortunate enough to maintain their Medicaid coverage after all the cuts have taken effect.

Conservative lawmakers in some states are quietly working to further restrict access to contraception — for example, by reclassifying as abortion widely used methods of birth control such as emergency contraception. This allows anti-abortion legislators to claim they are not banning birth control — even as they lay the groundwork to do exactly that.

Abortion and contraception are both critical components of bodily autonomy — which is why both are the target of constant attacks.

These attacks form a coordinated assault on access to reproductive health care. When people lose insurance, they lose the ability to pay for contraception and their relationship with a trusted health care provider who can support them in accessing the best birth control method for them. When clinics lose Title X funding, they may shut down entirely, leaving communities without access to birth control, testing for sexually transmitted infections or cancer screenings. And when providers such as Planned Parenthood are excluded from Medicaid, patients lose trusted sources of care.

It is abundantly clear that an attack on one aspect of sexual and reproductive health care is an attack on all forms of sexual and reproductive health care. We cannot afford to ignore these attacks simply because they are happening quietly or piecemeal. The cumulative effect is a reproductive health care crisis in slow motion — one that demands urgent attention and action.

Policymakers, advocates and the public must recognize what’s at stake and fight to protect and expand access to affordable birth control for everyone, regardless of income, identity or ZIP code.

Read the op-ed in The Hill.

First published on The Hill: September 4, 2025

Share

Printer-friendly version

Read More

News Release

Federally Qualified Health Centers Could Not Readily Replace Planned Parenthood

Report

Any Restrictions on Reproductive Health Care Harm Reproductive Autonomy: Evidence from Four States

Statement

Statement from Kelly Baden, Guttmacher Vice President for Public Policy, on Passage of the Budget Reconciliation Bill

Policy Analysis

Trump Administration’s Withholding of Funds Could Impact 30% of Title X Patients

Fact Sheet

How Project 2025 Seeks to Obliterate Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights

Topic

United States

  • Contraception

Geography

  • Northern America: United States

Tags

birth control

US Policy Resources

More
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.®

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.