Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Policy Analysis
October 2019

Title X Family Planning Services: Impactful but at Severe Risk

Authors

Rachel Benson Gold, Guttmacher Institute Adam Sonfield, Guttmacher Institute

Reproductive rights are under attack. Will you help us fight back with facts?

Donate

The Title X national family planning program has for decades been a central component of the safety net for millions of low-income and otherwise marginalized patients who are seeking contraceptive services and supplies, STI testing and treatment, and related preventive care. Yet, the Trump administration has markedly weakened the program through new regulations—collectively known as the domestic gag rule—that have driven numerous health care providers, including those affiliated with Planned Parenthood, out of the program.

New data from the Guttmacher Institute released in October 2019 illustrate the benefits of Title X–supported services—benefits that are now threatened. Importantly, all of the new Guttmacher data are from 2016, well before the Trump administration’s domestic gag rule was even proposed. So while these statistics speak to the crucial importance of Title X, they do not provide insights into the specific damage done by the gag rule.

Quantifying Title X’s Impact

The impact of Title X has been substantial over time, and the most recent data once again confirm it: In 2016, Title X–supported clinics provided contraceptive services to about 3.5 million female patients. Women who obtained contraceptive services from these clinics were able to postpone or avoid some 755,000 pregnancies that they would have been unable to prevent without access to publicly supported care.

By identifying and treating thousands of STIs that would otherwise have gone undetected, these clinics also prevented about 44,000 chlamydia infections, 7,200 gonorrhea infections and 370 cases of HIV among the partners of women obtaining this care. In addition, the screening and vaccination services provided by Title X–supported clinics at family planning visits helped patients avoid an estimated 4,600 cases of pelvic inflammatory disease, 780 cases of infertility, 410 ectopic pregnancies and 740 cases of cervical cancer.

Beyond the primary benefit of helping individuals to determine whether and when to become pregnant and to maintain their health, public investments in family planning are cost effective. In 2016, Title X–supported services to help patients prevent or delay pregnancies and to protect themselves and their partners against reproductive cancers and STIs resulted in net government savings of $4.4 billion, or nearly $5 for every public dollar invested.

Central to the Safety Net, But for How Long?

Title X–supported clinics have always been an important part of a broader family planning safety net, which also includes clinics that do not receive Title X dollars and private clinicians who serve Medicaid enrollees. Together, these safety-net clinics and clinicians provided publicly supported contraceptive and related services to an estimated 9.3 million female patients in 2016. Those services helped women to postpone or avoid 2 million pregnancies and helped prevent about 125,000 STI cases and nearly 2,000 cervical cancer cases.

Title X’s role in this safety net had already been weakened in recent years by declining federal and state investments in the program, which in some cases have led to clinic closures and reductions in services. Now, the Trump administration’s moves to implement the Title X gag rule are threatening the family planning safety net on which millions of women depend for their care.

 

First published online: October 31, 2019

Share

Printer-friendly version

Read More

Policy Analysis

Title X Under Attack—Our Comprehensive Guide

Report

Publicly Supported Family Planning Services in the United States: Likely Need, Availability and Impact, 2016

Policy Analysis

The Title X Gag Rule Is Wreaking Havoc—Just as Trump Intended

Resource

U.S. Policy Resources on Contraceptive Services

Fact Sheet

Publicly Supported Family Planning Services in the United States

Topic

United States

  • Contraception: Publicly Funded Family Planning

Geography

  • Northern America: United States

Tags

Domestic Gag Rule, Title X

US Policy Resources

More
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.