Skip to main content

Guttmacher Institute

Donate Now

Highlights

  • COVID-19 impact
  • IPSRH: Focus on Abortion
  • Adding It Up
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • U.S. policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • U.S.

Articles

  • Global research
  • U.S. research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Op-eds & external blogs

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • U.S.
  • U.S. State Laws and Policies

Data & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Infographics

Peer-Reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

U.S.

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work By Geography

  • Global
  • Asia
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • United States

Who We Are

  • About us
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • History
  • Contact

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Donate stock or securites
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Annual Report

Awards and Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship

Search form

Good reproductive health policy starts with credible research

 

Connect With Us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Email
Guttmacher Institute

Good reproductive health policy starts with credible research

 

Donate Now

Connect With Us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Email

Highlights

  • COVID-19 impact
  • IPSRH: Focus on Abortion
  • Adding It Up
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • U.S. policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • U.S.

Articles

  • Global research
  • U.S. research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Op-eds & external blogs

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • U.S.
  • U.S. State Laws and Policies

Data & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Infographics

Peer-Reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

U.S.

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work By Geography

  • Global
  • Asia
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • United States

Who We Are

  • About us
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • History
  • Contact

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Donate stock or securites
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Annual Report

Awards and Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship

Search form

As of January 1, 2021 State Laws and Policies

Insurance Coverage of Contraceptives

Background

Contraception is crucial for helping women avoid unintended pregnancies, and it has myriad health, social and economic benefits. Since the mid-1990s, 28 states have required health insurance plans regulated by the state that provide coverage of prescription drugs and devices to also cover prescription contraceptives.

Federal law, under a provision of the Affordable Care Act of 2010, expanded on these state policies in several ways. The federal contraceptive coverage guarantee applies to most private health plans nationwide, whether sold to employers, schools or individuals, or whether offered by employers that self-insure. (An employer that self-insures shoulders the financial risks for health care costs for its employees. State laws cannot regulate self-insured employers, which cover about 60% of insured workers nationwide.)

In addition, the federal guarantee specifically requires coverage for 18 methods of contraception used by women (including female sterilization), along with related counseling and services, and it requires this coverage to be provided without any out-of-pocket costs to the patient, such as copayments or deductibles. The federal guarantee does not require similar coverage for vasectomy or male condoms. Under the guarantee, health plans may apply formularies, prior authorization requirements and similar restrictions within a method category (e.g., to encourage patients to choose one hormonal IUD over another), but they may not favor one type of method over another (e.g., oral contraceptives over contraceptive rings). 

More recently, some states have amended and expanded their own requirements to match the standard set in the federal guarantee, specifically requiring coverage for the full range of contraceptive methods, counseling and services used by women; eliminating out-of-pocket costs; and limiting other health plan restrictions. Some of these new state provisions go beyond the federal guarantee by requiring coverage for contraceptive methods that are available over the counter without requiring the patient to first obtain a prescription, ensuring that women may receive an extended supply of a method at one time (usually a one-year supply, rather than a typical one- or three-month supply), or requiring coverage of male sterilization without out-of-pocket costs.

In October 2017, the Trump administration made it much easier for an employer to exclude contraceptive coverage from any health plan it offers to its employees and their dependents. One regulation allows any employer—nonprofit or for-profit—to exclude some or all contraceptive methods and services from the health plans it sponsors if the employer has religious objections. Another regulation allows employers with moral objections to do the same, although it applies to a slightly narrower set of employers (any employer that is not a publicly traded company). Enforcement of these regulations has been blocked by the courts. Previous federal regulations are in effect that offer an exemption for a much narrower set of explicitly religious employers and provide an “accommodation” for other nonprofit and closely held for-profit employers with religious objections that allows them to avoid paying or arranging for contraceptive coverage while still ensuring that employees and dependents receive coverage seamlessly from the same insurance company. Most of the state laws that expand contraceptive coverage offer exemptions as well, although few of them are as broad as the blocked federal exemption.   

Highlights

  • Federal law requires health insurance coverage for the full range of contraceptive methods used by women, including counseling and related services, without out-of-pocket costs.
    • This mandate applies to 18 specific methods delineated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which includes female sterilization and methods available over the counter (when obtained with a prescription).
    • Federal law allows for a "broader" refusal clause that allows churches, associations of churches, religiously affiliated elementary and secondary schools, and, potentially, some religious charities and universities to refuse; hospitals are not allowed to refuse.
  • 29 states and the District of Columbia require insurers that cover prescription drugs to provide coverage of FDA-approved prescription contraceptive drugs and devices.
    • 12 states and the District of Columbia require coverage of methods received over the counter; the insurer may still require the enrollee to obtain a prescription.
    • 20 states and the District of Columbia require insurers to cover an extended supply of contraceptives at one time.
    • 8 states require coverage of male sterilization, and 14 states and the District of Columbia require coverage of female sterilization.
  • 16 states and the District of Columbia prohibit cost sharing for contraceptives.
  • 9 states and the District of Columbia prohibit restrictions and delays by insurers, or the use of medical management techniques that restrict access to contraceptives.
  • 20 states and the District of Columbia allow certain employers and insurers to refuse to comply with the contraceptive coverage mandate; 8 states do not permit refusal by any employers or insurers.
    • 3 states include a limited refusal clause that allows only churches and church associations to refuse to provide coverage and does not permit hospitals or other entities to do so.
    • 7 states include a broader refusal clause that allows churches, associations of churches, religiously affiliated elementary and secondary schools, and, potentially, some religious charities and universities to refuse; hospitals are not allowed to refuse.
    • 7 states and the District of Columbia include an expansive refusal clause that allows religious organizations, including at least some hospitals, to refuse to provide coverage. (An additional state, Nevada, does not exempt any employers but allows religious insurers to refuse to provide coverage; two other states exempt both insurers and employers.)
    • 2 states include an almost unlimited refusal clause that allows religious and secular organizations to refuse to provide coverage.
    • 15 of the 20 states with exemptions and the District of Columbia require employees to be notified if their health plan does not cover contraceptives.
Printer-friendly version

For more information

  • Public Policy Office

    202 296-4012
    [email protected]

Topic

United States

  • Contraception: State Policies on Contraception

Geography

  • United States: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming

Related Content

Policy Analysis

Rounding Out the Contraceptive Coverage Guarantee: Why ‘Male’ Contraceptive Methods Matter for Everyone

Guttmacher Policy Review
Research Article

Changes in State Prescription Contraceptive Mandates For Insurers: The Effect on Women's Contraceptive Use

Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
Policy Analysis

Contraceptive Coverage at the U.S. Supreme Court: Countering the Rhetoric with Evidence

Guttmacher Policy Review
Policy Analysis

Implementing the Federal Contraceptive Coverage Guarantee: Progress and Prospects

Guttmacher Policy Review
Policy Analysis

Affordable Care Act Survives Supreme Court Test, But Medicaid Expansion Placed in Peril

Guttmacher Policy Review
Policy Analysis

Health insurance coverage among women of reproductive age before and after implementation of the affordable care act

Contraception
Policy Analysis

States Must Act to Shore Up the Federal Contraceptive Coverage Guarantee

Guttmacher Policy Review

Monthly State Policy Updates

Get an overview of state legislative and policy activity in all topics of sexual and reproductive health.

Learn More

Insurance Coverage of Contraceptives 

Jurisdiction

Coverage required for:

Prohibits cost sharing

Prohibits restrictions and delays

Refusal provisions

 

Prescription methods

Over-the-counter methods

Extended supply

Male sterilization

Female sterilization

Scope

Enrollees notified by:

Federal

X

X

 

 

X

X

 

Broader§

 

Arizona

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expansive

Employer

Arkansas

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

Broader

 

California

Xᵝ

X (excludes male condoms)

X

 

X

X

X

Limited

Employer

Colorado

Xᵝ

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

Connecticut

X

X

X

 

X

 X 

 

Expansive*,†

Insurer

Delaware

X

X (excludes male condoms) 

X

 

X

X

X

Expansive

Employer

District of Columbia

 Xᵝ​

 X

X

 

X

X

X

 Expansive£​

Employer£​ 

Georgia

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hawaii

  XӨ

 

X

 

 

 

 

Expansive†

Employer

Illinois

X

X (excludes male condoms)

X

X

X

X

X

Almost unlimited‡

 

Iowa

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Maine

X

 

X

 

X

X

 

Broader

Employer

Maryland 

Xᵝ

 X (drugs only)

X

X

 

X

 

Expansive

Employer

Massachusetts

X

X (excludes male condoms)

X

 

X

 X

 

Broader

Employer

Michigan

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

Broader

 

Missouri

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

Almost unlimited†,‡

Insurer

Montana

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nevada

X

 X (only EC)

X

 

X

X

X

Expansive‡

Insurer

New Hampshire

XӨ

 

X

 

 

X

 

 

 

New Jersey

X

X (excludes condoms)

X

X

 

X

X

 

Broader

Employer

New Mexico

Xᵝ

 X 

X

 X

X

X

X

Expansive

 

New York

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

Limited†

Employer/ insurer

North Carolina

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

Broader

Insurer

Ohio

 

 

€

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oregon

XӨ

X (excludes condoms) 

X

X

X

X

X

Limited

 

Rhode Island

X

 

X

 

 

 

 

Broader

Employer

TennesseeӨ

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Texas**

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Utah

β

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vermont

X

 

X

X

X

X

X

 

 

Virginia

 X

 

 X€

 

X

X

 

 

 

Washington

Xᵝ

 X

X

X

 X

 X

X

 

 

West VirginiaӨ​

X

 

X 

 

 

 

 

Expansive†

Insurer

Wisconsin

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

29 + DC

12 + DC

20 + DC

8

14 + DC

16 + DC

9 + DC

20 + DC

15 + DC

Note: EC=emergency contraception.

§ Regulations that offered an almost unlimited religious and moral exemption are currently blocked by the courts.

‡ Refusal clause applies to insurers.

ᵝ The state allows pharmacists to prescribe and dispense contraceptives, but insurance coverage of these services is not explicitly included in the law.* Religious insurers are not exempt from the mandate but may provide contraceptive coverage through a subcontract with another insurer or third-party entity.
† Enrollees have the option of obtaining coverage directly from insurer.

€ The state’s law allows pharmacists to dispense the full amount of a prescription at one time, including contraception, but there is no requirement that health insurance plans cover the cost of accessing a year’s worth of contraceptives at one time.

Ө The state explicitly includes coverage for contraception that is prescribed and dispensed by a pharmacist.

** Employers must be offered the option to include coverage of contraceptives within the health plan.

Get updates on policy issues and more

THIS CAN'T WAIT

Stand up for sexual and reproductive health and rights.
We need you now.

Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Reproductive rights are under attack. Will you help us fight back with facts?
Donate Now
Follow Guttmacher:

Connect With Us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn

Footer Menu

  • Privacy Policy
© 2021 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.

Get Our Updates