Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

U.S. resources

Skip to filters
  1. March 2016 Research Article

    The complexity of multiple contraceptive method use and the anxiety that informs it: implications for theory and practice

    Lori F. Frohwirth, Nakeisha Blades, Ann M. Moore and Heather M. Wurtz Archives of Sexual Behavior
  2. March 2016 Research Article

    Supplemental Table: Declines in Unintended Pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011

    New England Journal of Medicine
  3. March 2016 Infographic

    The U.S. unintended pregnancy rate is at its lowest in 30 years

  4. March 2016 News Release

    U.S. Unintended Pregnancy Rate Falls to 30-Year Low; Declines Seen in Almost All Groups, but Disparities Remain

  5. March 2016 Research Article

    Declines in unintended pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011

    Lawrence B. Finer and Mia R. Zolna New England Journal of Medicine
  6. March 2016 News Release

    Steep Drop in Unintended Pregnancy Is Behind the 2008–2011 U.S. Abortion Decline

  7. March 2016 Infographic

    Even when taking income into account, unintended pregnancy rates are high among black women in the U.S.

  8. February 2016 News Release

    U.S. Women Hold Complex Views About Their Agency Over Pregnancy and Pregnancy Prevention

  9. February 2016 Infographic

    Despite recent declines, unintended pregnancy rates in the U.S. remain high among women of color

  10. February 2016 Infographic

    Clear declines: a steep drop in unintended pregnancy in the U.S. is behind the 2008-2011 declines in abortions and unplanned births

  11. February 2016 Infographic

    Contraception is highly effective

  12. February 2016 Infographic

    Planned Parenthood health centers serve 36% of all clients obtaining care from publicly funded family planning centers, more than any other type of provider

  13. February 2016 Policy Analysis

    Health Coverage Trends Among U.S. Women of Reproductive Age Varied Considerably with ACA Implementation

  14. February 2016 News Release

    Teens Seeking Family Planning Services Face Inconsistent Privacy Standards in Federally Qualified Health Centers

  15. February 2016 Policy Analysis

    Guttmacher Institute Amicus Brief Filed With the Supreme Court of the United States: Zubik vs. Burwell

Pagination

  • First page First
  • Previous page Prev.
  • …
  • Page 41
  • Page 42
  • Page 43
  • Page 44
  • Current page 45
  • Page 46
  • Page 47
  • Page 48
  • Page 49
  • …
  • Next page Next
  • Last page Last

Refine resources

Topic
Year range
Skip to results
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.®

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.