Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Policy Analysis
September 2019

Medication Abortion and the Changing Abortion Landscape

Authors

Megan K. Donovan, Guttmacher Institute

Reproductive rights are under attack. Will you help us fight back with facts?

Donate

Medication abortion is a safe and effective method of abortion that can be completed outside of a medical setting—for example, in the comfort and privacy of one’s home. Now, new data from the Guttmacher Institute reveal that even as overall abortion numbers continue to decline, the use of medication abortion in the United States continues to grow. In 2017, the number of early medication abortions provided in clinical settings rose to approximately 340,000, an overall increase of 25% from 2014.

Medication abortion has been transforming the provision of care since it was first approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2000, and the latest data confirm that it continues to represent an increasingly significant proportion of all U.S. abortions, accounting for 39% in 2017. In fact, it is now the most common method used for abortions up to 10 weeks’ gestation, accounting for 60% of all such abortions in 2017. 

Telehealth and Self-Managed Abortion

The transformative power of medication abortion is not limited to numbers; it is also part of a changing landscape of abortion care. A prime example is the growing provision of abortion via telehealth, which allows abortion providers to extend care to new and underserved communities using remote technology. Taking advantage of the simplicity and convenience of medication abortion, telehealth abortion models have allowed abortion care to evolve alongside the broader health care industry and have reduced barriers related to travel, staffing and infrastructure. Yet, current federal and state restrictions on medication abortion place limits on the reach of telehealth, so there is significant untapped potential that could be realized through proactive policy changes.

Medication abortion also offers a safe and effective option for people who decide to self-manage their abortion care: It is more than 95% effective and expected complications are similar to those of a miscarriage. While self-managed abortion is not a new phenomenon, it may be becoming more common in the United States: In 2017, 18% of nonhospital facilities offering abortion reported that they had seen one or more patients seeking care after self-management, compared to 12% in 2014. Advocates and researchers expect the number of people self-managing their abortions to continue to grow, and medication abortion will undoubtedly be a big part of that story.

Challenges and Gaps

Despite this progress, there are significant challenges and gaps in knowledge to overcome before these developments can fully and equitably reach their true potential.

For example, abortion stigma is heightened when it comes to self-managed abortion, and in the years since Roe v. Wade, people have sometimes been prosecuted under state statutes for self-management. Moreover, given the broader societal context of discriminatory law enforcement, people of color, low-income individuals and immigrants are at higher risk of being criminalized than others if they pursue self-management. As policymakers and advocates work toward a future that more fully supports self-managed abortion, it is critical to ensure that people who self-manage are not punished.

In addition, more research is needed to fully contextualize the ongoing increase in the number of medication abortions. As the incidence of medication abortion has gone up, so too has the number of clinics that provide only medication abortion. While this trend could represent an overall gain in access—some abortion care where there might otherwise be none—it could also mean that some providers are shifting away from providing other options. Perhaps most significantly, it could also mean that medication abortion is the only option available in some areas of the country. As advocates and policymakers work to identify policies and practices that protect and expand access to abortion, it is important to strive for policies that ensure access to the full range of safe and effective methods, and to consider the ethical implications of a system that falls short of that goal.

First published online: September 26, 2019

Share

Printer-friendly version

Read More

Opinion

Self-Managed Abortion May Be On The Rise, But Probably Not A Significant Driver Of The Overall Decline In Abortion

Health Affairs Blog
Policy Analysis

Self-Managed Medication Abortion: Expanding the Available Options for U.S. Abortion Care

Guttmacher Policy Review
Policy Analysis

Improving Access to Abortion via Telehealth

Guttmacher Policy Review
Policy Analysis

Ensuring Access to Abortion at the State Level: Selected Examples and Lessons

Guttmacher Policy Review
State Laws and Policies

Medication Abortion

Fact Sheet

Abortion in the United States

Resource

U.S. Policy Resources on Abortion

Topic

United States

  • Abortion

Geography

  • Northern America: United States

Tags

public health, self-managed abortion

US Policy Resources

More
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.