Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Fact Sheet
September 2021

Use of Emergency Contraception in the United States

From the series Contraceptive Use in the United States
Who Uses Contraception
Methods Used
Emergency Contraception
Effectiveness

Emergency contraception is a method for preventing pregnancy after unprotected sex or contraceptive failure.

  • Emergency contraception has no effect on an established pregnancy and cannot cause miscarriage or abortion.1
  • Dedicated emergency contraceptive pills work best when used as soon as possible after unprotected sex or contraceptive failure, and are effective for up to 3–5 days afterward.2
  • Nonhormonal copper IUDs inserted up to five days after unprotected intercourse can also act as emergency contraception,2 and recent evidence suggests that levonorgestrel IUDs may be used similarly.3

Use of emergency contraceptive pills 

Between 2008 and 2015, emergency contraceptive pill use increased substantially.4 (Please note that these usage data are for emergency contraceptive pills only and do not include use of the IUD as emergency contraception.)

  • Women* reported two main reasons for using emergency contraceptive pills in 2015: Forty-one percent feared that their regular method would not work, and 50% reported having had unprotected sex.4

23%

of sexually experienced U.S. women aged 15–44 in 2015

had ever used emergency contraceptive pills, up from 11% in 2008 4

  • Use of emergency contraceptive pills increased substantially across almost every social and demographic characteristic examined, including age, race and ethnicity, income level, education, religion, marital status and women’s number of births, between 2008 and 2015.4
Close window

Share this image:

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • In 2015, use was highest among sexually experienced women aged 20–29 and those who had never given birth. Among women in these groups, 35–36% reported having ever used emergency contraceptive pills.4
  • Between 2008 and 2015, repeat use of emergency contraceptive pills among all sexually experienced women increased from 4% to 10%. Many women who had ever used emergency contraceptive pills had used them more than once (41% in 2008 and 45% in 2015).4

Changes in obtaining emergency contraception

  • Reliance on a prescription to obtain emergency contraceptive pills fell from 31% in 2008 to 18% in 2015, despite the overall increase in use of this method.4
  • Sixty-seven percent of women who used emergency contraceptive pills in 2008 obtained them at a health facility or clinic; in 2015, only 40% obtained them in this manner, likely reflecting some of the impact of the change to over-the-counter availability.4

Relevant policy developments

Access to and use of emergency contraception has likely shifted as a result of key policy changes.

  • The Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive coverage guarantee took effect widely in January 2013. This new benefit eliminated cost sharing for emergency contraception (and other forms of contraception) for privately insured individuals, but only if they obtained a prescription.5
  • Although the contraceptive coverage guarantee may have alleviated the cost burden for covered individuals obtaining emergency contraceptive pills by prescription, it may have inadvertently shifted the cost burden for others because the guarantee does not cover over-the-counter methods.4
  • By 2014, the one-pill regimens of levonorgestrel emergency contraception (Plan B One-Step and generic formulas) had been approved for over-the-counter sales (i.e., by a pharmacist without a prescription or age restrictions).6

1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Emergency contraception, 2019, https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/practice-bulletin/articles/2015/09/emergency-contraception.

2. Trussell J, Raymond EG and Cleland K, Emergency contraception: a last chance to prevent unintended pregnancy, Contemporary Readings in Law & Social Justice, 2014, 6(2):7–38, https://www.ceeol.com/content-files/document-124303.pdf.

3. Turok D et al., Levonorgestrel vs. copper intrauterine devices for emergency contraception, New England Journal of Medicine, 2021, 384(4):335–344, https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2022141.

4. Hussain R and Kavanaugh M, Changes in use of emergency contraceptive pills in the United States from 2008–2015, Contraception: X, 2021, 3:100065, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151621000125.

5. Guttmacher Institute, The federal contraceptive coverage guarantee: an effective policy that should be strengthened and expanded, Federal Policy Snapshots, 2021, https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/contraceptive-coverage-guarantee.

6. Cleland K et al., Access to emergency contraception in the over-the-counter era, Womens Health Issues, 2016, 26(6):622–627, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5106326/.

References

1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Emergency contraception, 2019, https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/practice-bulletin/articles/2015/09/emergency-contraception.

2. Trussell J, Raymond EG and Cleland K, Emergency contraception: a last chance to prevent unintended pregnancy, Contemporary Readings in Law & Social Justice, 2014, 6(2):7–38, https://www.ceeol.com/content-files/document-124303.pdf.

3. Turok D et al., Levonorgestrel vs. copper intrauterine devices for emergency contraception, New England Journal of Medicine, 2021, 384(4):335–344, https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2022141.

4. Hussain R and Kavanaugh M, Changes in use of emergency contraceptive pills in the United States from 2008–2015, Contraception: X, 2021, 3:100065, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151621000125.

5. Guttmacher Institute, The federal contraceptive coverage guarantee: an effective policy that should be strengthened and expanded, Federal Policy Snapshots, 2021, https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/contraceptive-coverage-guarantee.

6. Cleland K et al., Access to emergency contraception in the over-the-counter era, Womens Health Issues, 2016, 26(6):622–627, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5106326/.

*In this fact sheet, we refer to the contraceptive users for whom we have data as “women” to reflect the terminology used in the National Survey of Family Growth, a nationally representative survey of people aged 15–49 that gathers information on several topics, including contraceptive use. However, we recognize that data collection processes do not always accurately or comprehensively capture participants’ gender. We encourage readers to consider that contraceptive users’ gender identities are diverse, despite the limitations of this language and survey process.

Footnotes

*In this fact sheet, we refer to the contraceptive users for whom we have data as “women” to reflect the terminology used in the National Survey of Family Growth, a nationally representative survey of people aged 15–49 that gathers information on several topics, including contraceptive use. However, we recognize that data collection processes do not always accurately or comprehensively capture participants’ gender. We encourage readers to consider that contraceptive users’ gender identities are diverse, despite the limitations of this language and survey process.

From the series Contraceptive Use in the United States

Share

Reproductive rights are under attack. Will you help us fight back with facts?

Donate

Read More

State Laws and Policies

Emergency Contraception

Research Article

Changes in Use of Emergency Contraceptive Pills in the United States from 2008-2015

Contraception: X
Fact Sheet

The Federal Contraceptive Coverage Guarantee: A Critical Policy That Must Be Protected

Topic

United States

  • Contraception

Geography

  • Northern America: United States

Tags

birth control
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.