Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Opinion
June 2017

A critical moment to increase investments in meeting women’s family planning needs

Authors

Ann M. Starrs

Reproductive rights are under attack. Will you help us fight back with facts?

Donate

Abstract / Summary

In an op-ed originally published on BMJ Opinion, Guttmacher President and CEO Ann Starrs examines the costs and benefits of meeting the sexual and reproductive health needs of women in developing countries, and calls for greater global investments in family planning services.

Today, 214 million women in developing countries want to avoid pregnancy but are not using a modern method of contraception. While this is a daunting number, it reflects a decline from 225 million women with unmet need for modern contraception just three years ago—notwithstanding an increase in the number of women of reproductive age in the intervening years.

This steady progress is a direct result of global commitments to address women’s sexual and reproductive health needs—including by investing in contraceptive services. The United States has long been a global leader in funding family planning programs in the world’s poorest countries. This standing, however, is now threatened by the policies of the Trump administration that threaten to reverse the United States’ long-held development goal of improving health worldwide.

On his first business day in office, President Trump signed an executive policy that not only reimposed, but expanded the global gag rule, blocking all US global health assistance to foreign nongovernmental organizations that use their own funding to engage in abortion-related services, referrals, or advocacy. Beyond its effect on abortion-related services, the global gag rule bans the most effective and trusted providers of family planning services from receiving US aid if they refuse to abide by it. The ultimate irony is that—by undermining access to family planning services and denying women the tools that they need to prevent unwanted pregnancies—the gag rule contributes to the very thing it purportedly seeks to reduce: the likelihood of abortion.

Continuing its attacks, the administration announced in March that it would defund the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), one of the leading providers of sexual and reproductive health services in the world. And in May, the administration called for the outright elimination of all US international family planning aid. This year alone, this funding made it possible for 26 million women and couples to receive contraceptive services and supplies, averting eight million unintended pregnancies and 15,000 maternal deaths.

These policies will have a direct effect on millions of women. Investments in sexual and reproductive health are critical for saving lives and reducing ill-health among women and their children—and for fulfilling their internationally recognized right to good health. Investing in reproductive and sexual health services in developing regions is key to reducing poverty and promoting development, and saves money overall. New research by the Guttmacher Institute shows that:

  • Every additional dollar spent on contraceptive services in developing regions saves $2.30 in maternal and newborn healthcare. This is because investing in family planning services decreases the incidence of unintended pregnancies, unplanned births, and abortions, which significantly lowers the cost of pregnancy-related care.
  • Women with an unmet need for modern contraception—those who want to avoid a pregnancy but are not using a modern contraceptive method—account for 84% of all unintended pregnancies in developing regions. Enabling these women to use effective contraceptives is therefore critical.
  • Expanding and improving services to meet all women’s needs for modern contraception in developing countries would cost $11 billion annually, or $1.75 per person per year. The impact of this investment would be dramatic.
  • Fully meeting family planning needs would result in 67 million fewer unintended pregnancies per year. There would be 23 million fewer unplanned births and 36 million fewer induced abortions—many of which would occur in countries where abortion is broadly restricted and, as a result, is often performed under clandestine conditions.

We know that investing in family planning works. Ensuring that women and couples can prevent unintended pregnancies improves women’s health, strengthens families and communities, and saves lives and money.

Given the tangible progress we are starting to see in meeting women’s contraceptive needs, more investments in family planning services in developing countries are needed at every level. Now is not the time to turn back the clock on this progress.

Ann M. Starrs is president and CEO of the Guttmacher Institute. She is an expert in reproductive and maternal health. She is also an influential advocate for the health and rights of women and adolescent girls worldwide.

This article was originally published on BMJ Opinion.

First published on BMJ Opinion: June 29, 2017

Share

Printer-friendly version

Read More

Fact Sheet

Adding It Up: Investing in Contraception and Maternal and Newborn Health, 2017

Fact Sheet

Adding It Up: Investing in Contraception and Maternal and Newborn Health in Asia

Fact Sheet

Adding It Up: Investing in Contraception and Maternal and Newborn Health in Latin America and the Caribbean

Infographic

Benefits of investing in sexual and reproductive health

Infographic

Benefits of investing in both contraception and maternal and newborn care, 2017

Infographic

Disparities in pregnancy-related care, 2017

Infographic

Disparities in modern contraceptive use, 2017

Infographic

Unintended pregnancies among women with unmet need for modern contraception, 2017

Infographic

Costs and benefits of investing in contraception and maternal and newborn health, 2017

Infographic

Savings associated with investment in contraceptive services, 2017

Infographic

Unmet need for modern contraception, 2017

News Release

Greater Investments Needed to Meet Women’s Sexual and Reproductive Health Needs in Developing Regions

Fact Sheet

Adding It Up: Investing in Contraception and Maternal and Newborn Health in Africa

Topic

Global

  • Contraception: Costs and Benefits
  • Pregnancy

Geography

  • Global
  • Asia
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Africa

Tags

Adding It Up

US Policy Resources

More
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.