Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Roe v. Wade Overturned
  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • State legislation tracker

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Data, Videos & Visualizations

  • Data center
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Public-use data sets

Peer-reviewed Journals

  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • HIV & STIs
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • 2024 Impact Report

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Fact Sheet
March 2025

The Federal Contraceptive Coverage Guarantee: A Critical Policy That Must Be Protected

From the series Federal Policy Snapshots
Contraceptive Coverage Guarantee
Sex Education
Global Gag Rule and Helms Amendment
Hyde Amendment
Immigrants’ Health Insurance
Weldon Amendment

Contraception is basic preventive health care that should be affordable and accessible for everyone. Under a provision of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) known as the federal contraceptive coverage guarantee, most private health insurance plans in the United States must cover the full range of contraceptive methods, services and counseling without patients’ incurring out-of-pocket costs such as copayments or deductibles. A substantial body of evidence confirms that the contraceptive coverage guarantee has had a positive impact since it took effect in 2012—dramatically reducing patients’ costs and helping them to effectively use the birth control method of their choice. This suggests that federal policymakers should strengthen contraceptive coverage protections and extend them to everyone in the United States, regardless of how they get health insurance. 

How the contraceptive coverage guarantee works

  • The federal contraceptive coverage guarantee is a part of a broader requirement under the ACA for most private health plans to cover a wide range of preventive services without copayments, deductibles or other out-of-pocket costs. In 2011, the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) adopted expert recommendations for what must be covered as women’s preventive services, a list that included the full range of contraceptive methods, counseling and services. Since 2011, HRSA has updated these recommendations several times:
    • Contraception was reaffirmed as preventive care in the updated recommendations adopted by HRSA in 2016.
    • In 2019, HRSA expanded the coverage guarantee to include to the full range of “female-controlled” contraceptive methods approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), as well as related counseling, initiation and follow-up care. This coverage includes a wide spectrum of contraceptive options designed to prevent unintended pregnancies and improve birth outcomes, from sterilization and long-acting reversible contraceptives to emergency contraception and fertility awareness-based methods.
    • In 2021, male condoms were included as options that must be covered without cost-sharing. While the guarantee now covers male condoms, it continues to exclude vasectomy, and some health plans and entities remain exempt from the requirement. In 2024, the Biden administration proposed a rule to address remaining exclusions—including coverage of over-the-counter contraception without prescription or cost-sharing requirements—but withdrew it before it was finalized and the Trump administration took office. A large majority of private health plans are subject to the contraceptive coverage requirement, including most offered by employers, schools, and unions, and those offered through the ACA’s health insurance marketplaces.
  • Some plans or entities are exempt from the contraceptive coverage requirement:
    • “Grandfathered plans,” which are exempt from many ACA requirements and which enrolled 14% of covered workers in 2020.
    • “Church plans,” which are established by houses of worship and other religiously affiliated nonprofits; they are exempt from federal enforcement under the ACA’s preventive services requirement.
    • An employer or university claiming a religious or moral objection to covering contraception can exclude such coverage from health plans offered to employees or students.
  • The HRSA guidance requires health plans subject to the federal contraceptive coverage guarantee to cover each distinct method deemed “female controlled” by the FDA (e.g., oral contraceptive pills and IUDs), as well as related counseling, services needed to initiate or discontinue use, and follow-up care. Federal guidance specifically prohibits covered entities from denying coverage for services based on an individual’s sex assigned at birth, gender identity, or gender as recorded by the insurer. It also limits plans’ ability to use gatekeeping “medical management techniques,” such as formularies or prior authorization requirements, that make it difficult for enrollees to obtain their preferred products or services. However, health plans have not always complied with these rules.
  • In addition to the federal ACA requirement, 31 states and the District of Columbia have their own contraceptive coverage requirements for private insurers, which must comply with both federal and state laws. While state laws apply to a smaller subset of health plans (most notably, they do not apply to employers that “self-insure” instead of buying traditional insurance), some states go beyond the federal guarantee by requiring coverage for vasectomy or for an extended (e.g., 12-month) supply of a method at one time. 

Impact of the contraceptive coverage guarantee

  • Contraceptive methods and services can be prohibitively expensive for many patients. Eliminating these costs through insurance coverage can help people use their preferred methods. That, in turn, can facilitate effective contraceptive use and protect against contraceptive coercion, in which patients may be pressured to use methods they do not prefer.
  • Numerous studies confirm that the federal contraceptive coverage guarantee has dramatically reduced patients’ out-of-pocket spending. Following the ACA’s implementation, the proportion of privately insured women paying nothing for contraception increased substantially. For example, between fall 2012 and spring 2014 (the period during which the coverage guarantee went into wide effect), the proportion of privately insured women who paid nothing out of pocket for the contraceptive pill increased from 15% to 67%, with similar changes for injectable contraceptives, the vaginal ring and the IUD.
Close window

Share this image:

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
After the federal contraceptive coverage guarantee took effect
  • Among privately insured women, nearly one in four (24%) still paid some amount out of pocket for contraceptive care in 2020, likely due to gaps in the federal coverage guarantee and health plans’ failure to comply with it.
  • More than two-thirds (69%) of obstetrician-gynecologists in a 2020 survey reported that the share of patients using their desired contraceptive method had increased in the years since the federal coverage guarantee took effect.
  • More than half (55%) of US ob-gyns reported seeing increases in the share of patients seeking some form of contraception since the Dobbs decision, particularly sterilization (43%) and IUDs and implants (47%).
  • Multiple studies (summarized in several reviews) suggest that the coverage guarantee has increased the use of prescription methods—particularly IUDs and implants—as well as consistent contraceptive use. Contrary to the false claims of some activists opposed to contraception, every FDA-approved contraceptive method is effective at preventing pregnancy, and there is a strong scientific consensus that providing people access to contraceptive information and services does not increase sexual activity. 

What policymakers can do

Under the Trump-Vance administration, policymakers should take decisive actions to fully enforce and strengthen contraceptive coverage protections. These include:  

  • Reaffirm and enforce all of the ACA’s provisions, including its contraceptive coverage guarantee. The ACA provides 44 million people with health care coverage and reducing or compromising this coverage would have devasting effects. Federal agencies must hold insurers accountable by strictly enforcing the requirement that health plans cover all costs related to contraceptive use, including consultations, prescriptions, procedures and services.
  • Enforce the ACA’s requirement that health plans cover all costs related to contraceptive use, including all services needed to begin, end, or change methods.
  • Encourage plans to cover OTC contraceptive methods, a 12-month supply of contraceptives at one time, and contraceptive methods focused on male partners (such as external condoms and vasectomy).
  • Require health plans to establish clear processes for patients to obtain coverage for provider-recommended contraceptives, even when the product is not on a plan’s formulary. These processes should align with federal guidelines, ensure timely determinations, and include a clear appeals mechanism.
  • Resist harmful religious and moral exemptions that undermine contraceptive coverage guarantees. Ensure patients have contraceptive coverage without out-of-pocket costs, regardless of their employer’s beliefs.
  • Eliminate any requirement that contraceptives otherwise available OTC have a prescription in order to be covered by insurance.
  • Require comprehensive coverage of reproductive health care—including for contraceptive methods, services and counseling—across all types of public and private health plans, either through stand-alone legislation or as part of a broader set of health care reforms.

Acknowledgments

This fact sheet was updated by Managi Lord-Biggers. It was edited by Ian Lague.

From the series Federal Policy Snapshots

Share

Reproductive rights are under attack. Will you help us fight back with facts?

Donate

Read More

Resource

U.S. Policy Resources on Contraceptive Services

Initiative

The Path Ahead: Restoring and Advancing Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights

Policy Analysis

A Fragmented System: Ensuring Comprehensive Contraceptive Coverage in All U.S. Health Insurance Plans

Guttmacher Policy Review
Policy Analysis

What Is at Stake with the Federal Contraceptive Coverage Guarantee?

Guttmacher Policy Review
State Laws and Policies

Insurance Coverage of Contraceptives

Topic

United States

  • Contraception: Affordable Care Act (ACA), Publicly Funded Family Planning

Geography

  • Northern America: United States

Tags

birth control
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2025 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.