Skip to main content
Guttmacher Institute

Search

  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
Guttmacher Institute
Donate

Highlights

  • Reproductive Health Impact Study
  • Adding It Up
  • Abortion Worldwide
  • Guttmacher-Lancet Commission
  • US policy resources
  • State policy resources
  • International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1975–2020)
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (1969–2020)

Reports

  • Global
  • United States

Articles

  • Global research
  • US research
  • Policy analysis
  • Guttmacher Policy Review
  • Opinion

Fact Sheets

  • Global
  • United States
  • US State Laws and Policies

Tools

  • Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe
  • Family Planning Investment Impact Calculator
  • Monthly Abortion Provision Study Dashboard
  • State legislation tracker
  • Public-use data sets

Global

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

US

  • Abortion
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy
  • Teens

Our Work by Geography

  • Global
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & the Caribbean
  • Northern America
  • Oceania

Who We Are

  • About
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Job opportunities
  • Newsletter
  • History
  • Contact
  • Conflict of Interest Policy

Media

  • Media office
  • News releases

Support Our Work

  • Make a gift today
  • Monthly Giving Circle
  • Ways to Give
  • Guttmacher Guardians
  • Guttmacher Legacy Circle
  • Financials
  • Impact Report 2025

Awards & Scholarships

  • Darroch Award
  • Richards Scholarship
  • Bixby Fellowship
Donate
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact
Fact Sheet
January 2026

Year One of Project 2025: Tracking the Trump Administration’s Devastating Campaign Against Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights

During the 2024 campaign, President Trump repeatedly tried to distance himself from the Heritage Foundation’s far-right policy agenda Project 2025,1 claiming to know nothing about the framework or the people behind it (despite many of its authors having roles in his first administration). One year in, however, it is clear that Project 2025 is serving as the Trump administration’s playbook for implementing an extreme policy agenda at the federal level, attacking sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) both domestically and globally.  

While the crisis in sexual and reproductive health access started long before 2025, Trump’s return to the White House has been marked by a slate of regressive policies and actions. These include steps explicitly laid out in Project 2025: removing Biden-era protections for abortion access post-Dobbs; drastically undermining access to contraception, gender-affirming care and other reproductive health services; and dismantling evidence-based resources related to public health in general and sexual and reproductive health in particular. Underlying all those actions is a reliance on misinformation, inaccurate language and inflammatory rhetoric that create stigma, confusion and fear around many essential SRH services. As modeled in Project 2025, this approach deploys anti-abortion, anti-science and transphobic language that undermines the autonomy and erases the identities of targeted communities. Taken together, the administration’s policies and rhetoric will undoubtedly have devastating and sustained impacts on sexual and reproductive health and well-being in the United States and globally.

This fact sheet summarizes key components of Project 2025’s anti-SRHR agenda and then describes how and to what extent each has been implemented during the first year of the current administration.

Attacking Abortion Access

Project 2025 Goal: Retract Biden-era guidance that allows states to use Medicaid waivers to support patients traveling out of state for reproductive health care.(p.471)

Trump Action: In January 2025, Trump issued an executive order (EO) revoking several Biden-era EOs designed to protect and expand reproductive health care access, including one that directed the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to take steps to support access for patients who need to travel out of state for abortion care. The resulting Biden-era guidance to governors, which had invited state applications for Medicaid waivers to support such travelling patients, was removed from the HHS website after Trump’s EO. The ability to use Medicaid waivers for this purpose may also be affected by the release of a July 2025 Department of Justice (DOJ) slip opinion stating that the Hyde Amendment prohibits the use of federal funds for “ancillary services necessary to receive an abortion.” Project 2025 targeted such protective policies in part because interstate travel for abortion care has played a crucial role in preserving access since the Dobbs decision, with tens of thousands of people crossing state lines for care because of abortion bans and restrictions in their home states. 

Project 2025 Goal: Rescind all clinical policy directives within the Veterans Health Administration (VA) that support access to abortion services.(p.644)

Trump Action: In August 2025, the Trump administration issued a notice of proposed rulemaking to rescind a Biden-era regulation that had, for the first time, allowed VA facilities to provide abortion counseling and services in cases of rape, incest, or when the pregnant person's life or health is threatened. The rule goes beyond previous prohibitions, forbidding coverage of abortion counseling and services for veterans through their medical benefits package and for their dependents under the Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Department of Veterans Affairs (CHAMPVA.) These restrictions apply even if the pregnancy endangers the patient’s health or life or is the result of rape or incest. A memo released in mid-December confirmed that the administration had begun implementing these changes before completing the regular rulemaking process. The rule was finalized on December 31.

Project 2025 Goal: Prohibit the use of public money to facilitate or support servicemembers’ access to abortion care.(p.104) 

Trump Action: While federal law already restricts the military’s health insurance program (TRICARE) from covering abortion services, in January 2025, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth issued a memorandum rescinding Biden-era policies that had provided allowances for servicemembers and their dependents to travel and take time off to access abortion care. 

Project 2025 Goal: Reverse approval of mifepristone and—as an interim step—reinstate REMS restrictions that would eliminate telehealth access to abortion medication and limit who can dispense it.(pp.457‒459)

Trump Action: In its first year, the administration has initiated steps that could culminate in the severe restriction of mifepristone. 

In the fall of 2025, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Martin Makary announced that they are undertaking a review of the safety of mifepristone (one of two drugs used in most medication abortions), with an eye toward tightening the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) restrictions attached to the drug. This review process lacks transparency and appears to be operating outside of standard FDA procedures. Furthermore, the impetus for reviewing mifepristone, which has a well-established track record of safety and efficacy, appears to be a number of retracted papers and junk science put forth by anti-abortion groups. If the administration decides to reinstate some of the most burdensome and unscientific aspects of the REMS, including a requirement that physicians must dispense the drug in person, it would effectively eliminate telehealth access to medication abortion. It would also have a devastating impact on abortion access more generally, particularly in states where telehealth provision makes up the majority of abortions. Kennedy has repeatedly stated that he will defer to Trump for the final decision about whether mifepristone should remain available at all, suggesting that the conclusions of any scientific review process may be overridden by political interference.

Threatening Patient Privacy and Safety

Project 2025 Goal: Revoke Biden-era guidance that bolstered privacy protections for reproductive health care within the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).(p.497)  

Trump Action: In June 2025, Trump appointee Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk vacated Biden administration regulations designed to protect patients seeking lawful reproductive health care from having their personal health information turned over to law enforcement. This was a particularly important protection for abortion patients residing in states where abortion is banned and who have to travel to receive care. The Trump administration has taken no action to defend the regulations or otherwise protect patient privacy. 

Project 2025 Goal: Stop “double standards” in enforcement of the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act. (Project 2025 asserts that FACE Act enforcement should not, as intended, focus on harassment and violence at abortion clinics but instead be used to protect anti-abortion centers, also known as crisis pregnancy centers.)(p.558)

Trump Action: In January 2025, Trump pardoned 23 people who had targeted abortion clinics and had been convicted of violating the FACE Act. (Since being pardoned, two of these activists have already been charged in Pennsylvania for trespassing at an abortion clinic.) Trump's DOJ subsequently issued an order to cease enforcement of the FACE Act in almost all cases. 

Project 2025 Goal: Revoke Biden-era interpretation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) that included gender discrimination in the Act’s ban on health care discrimination.(p.475)

Trump Action: In February, the Trump administration rescinded Biden-era guidance on Section 1557 of the ACA, which had been interpreted to provide protection against discrimination on the basis of gender identity. In November 2025, a federal court vacated provisions of Section 1557 regulations related to gender identity discrimination.

Denying Abortion Access in Emergency Situations

Project 2025 Goal: Rescind Biden-era guidance affirming the obligation of hospitals in all states—regardless of their abortion laws—to provide emergency abortion care under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA).(pp. 473‒474) 

Trump Action: The Trump administration rescinded Biden’s EMTALA guidance to hospitals in June 2025. Although the EMTALA statute remains unchanged, this stance adds to the chaos and confusion for providers and patients and puts pregnant people’s lives at further risk. 

Project 2025 Goal: Withdraw from ongoing litigation defending access to abortion care under EMTALA, reversing the Biden administration stance.(p.474) 

Trump Action: In March 2025, the Trump administration dismissed a lawsuit initiated by the Biden administration against Idaho, which had charged the state with violating EMTALA by enforcing an abortion ban without a health exception.

Weaponizing Federal Medicaid Dollars

Project 2025 Goal: Prohibit Planned Parenthood from receiving Medicaid reimbursement for any care it provides.(pp. 471‒472) 

Trump Action: Through the 2025 budget reconciliation law, also known as the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (OBBBA), the Republican-controlled Congress and the Trump administration have enacted a one-year provision to “defund Planned Parenthood.” The policy, which took effect in July, makes Planned Parenthood affiliates and some other abortion providers ineligible for any federal Medicaid funds if they continue to provide abortion care. While federal Medicaid funds are already largely prohibited from covering abortion care, this defund provision extends to all other services otherwise covered by Medicaid, including contraception, STI testing and cancer screenings. Despite many Planned Parenthood health centers and some states using their own funds to support this care for Medicaid patients, their ability to do so is limited and the policy has already had devastating consequences.  

Project 2025 Goal: Make work requirements a condition of Medicaid eligibility.(p.468) 

Trump Action: Trump’s budget reconciliation law compels Medicaid recipients enrolled under the ACA Medicaid expansion to meet new work requirements—a policy with onerous reporting and administrative burdens that is ultimately designed to drive people off Medicaid. Set to go into effect in January 2027, the provision threatens to eliminate Medicaid coverage for between 2.1 and 6 million women of reproductive age (19–49 years), a group that will be particularly impacted by a loss of coverage for SRH care.

Attacking Contraception

Project 2025 Goal: Prohibit Title X funding from going to entities that provide abortion care.(p.491)

Trump Action: In April 2025, the Trump administration abruptly withheld funding for 22 grants under Title X, the nation’s only federal program dedicated to providing family planning services to low-income people. While the program already does not provide funding for abortion care, the administration claimed that the Title X grantees were in potential violation of recent executive orders, including prohibitions on diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs. While some of the grants were eventually restored, Title X funding for many Planned Parenthood grantees is still being withheld.

Targeting Reproductive Health Worldwide

Project 2025 Goal: Reinstate the global gag rule, a policy that prohibits foreign non-governmental organizations (NGOs) who receive US funding from using their own funds to provide abortion services, information, counseling or referrals, or to participate in abortion-related advocacy.(p.260)

Trump Action: In January 2025, President Trump issued a presidential memorandum directing the Departments of State and HHS to reinstate the global gag rule, with the same restrictions on global health funding that had been in place during the previous Trump administration. 

Project 2025 Goal: Block funding to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA).(pp.260‒261)

Trump Action: The Trump administration abruptly terminated funding agreements to UNFPA in February 2025, and Congress voted to rescind funding previously appropriated to UNFPA through the Rescissions Act of 2025. The administration then cut off all future US funding to UNFPA by invoking the Kemp‒Kasten Amendment, a policy that has been repeatedly misapplied for the purpose of defunding UNFPA.  

Project 2025 Goal: Scale back the global footprint of the US Agency for International Development (USAID) to align US foreign assistance with an “America first,” conservative philosophy.(pp.254 & 279) 

Trump Action: The Trump administration went beyond what was outlined in Project 2025 and completely dismantled USAID. After first imposing a 90-day funding freeze to review grants and programs, the administration then cancelled all international family planning grants and cut funding and staff for global health and SRH programs. By July 2025, the agency had officially shut down and the few hundred remaining staff were incorporated into the Department of State. In September, the State Department released an “America First Global Health Strategy” that outlines new goals for foreign health assistance said to make “America safer, stronger, and more prosperous,” and which focus on bilateral country-to-country agreements.

Undermining International Human Rights

Project 2025 Goal: Rejoin the Geneva Consensus Declaration on Women’s Health and Protection of the Family and bring all foreign policy engagements into alignment with its views on human rights.(p.192)

Trump Action: Upon taking office in 2025, the Trump administration rejoined the so-called Geneva Consensus Declaration, an anti-rights, anti-abortion, anti-gender joint statement that undermines human rights. The declaration is a non-binding document that was never adopted by the United Nations. 

Trump Action: The State Department announced in November that their annual report on human rights will now categorize abortion as a human rights violation. In a radical departure from focusing on democracy and established human rights norms, US officials were given new guidance to include state subsidization of abortion and gender-transition surgeries for minors as infringements of human rights. They were also asked to report on the number of abortions performed in each country and to collect data on the enforcement of diversity, equity and inclusion programs.

Promoting Mis- and Disinformation to Attack Equity

Project 2025 Goal: Eliminate the Gender Policy Council established by a Biden administration executive order.(p.62)

Trump Action: Trump rescinded the Biden executive order and disbanded the Gender Policy Council, a group of advisors within the White House that was convened to advance gender equity in domestic and global policy.

Project 2025 Goal: Remove all terms related to gender, gender equality, reproductive health, reproductive rights, abortion, sexual orientation and gender identity from all federal legislation, federal rules, agency regulations, contracts, agency websites and grants.(pp.4‒5)

Trump Action: Upon taking office in 2025, President Trump issued an executive order mandating that the federal government recognize exclusively “an individual’s immutable biological classification as either male or female”—a direct attack on the health and rights of transgender, gender nonconforming and intersex individuals.  

Trump Action: Days into the Trump administration, federal agencies, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), began taking down government websites that are critical to the provision of reproductive health care, and which contained published research, publicly available datasets and clinical guidelines. While many of those sites have been restored (some as a result of court orders), others now contain troubling messages undermining the sites’ content. For example, the page for the CDC’s Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) now begins with this disclaimer: “Any information on this page promoting gender ideology is extremely inaccurate and disconnected from truth. The Trump Administration rejects gender ideology due to the harms and divisiveness it causes. This page does not reflect reality and therefore the Administration and this Department reject it.” 

Trump Action: Also on his first day back in office, President Trump signed another executive order to terminate all “diversity, equity, inclusion (DEI) and accessibility mandates, policies, programs, preferences and activities of the federal government.” This order has been used to justify the termination of NIH research grants and funding for programs that support people with low incomes, among other cuts and restrictions.

Attacking Transgender Rights and Health Care

Project 2025 Goal: Reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military.(p.104)

Trump Action: Just a week into his second term, President Trump issued an executive order banning transgender individuals from serving in the military. Additionally, Secretary of Defense Hegseth issued a memo on February 7 pausing all gender-affirming medical procedures for service members. On February 26, the Department of Defense issued another memo cancelling Biden-era policies that had protected trans individuals in the military, prohibiting trans individuals from serving, and directing trans individuals currently in the military to be separated from service.

Project 2025 Goal: Change the requirements for Medicare coverage of gender-affirming care to be more restrictive, calling for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to acknowledge false claims that "such interventions are dangerous."(p.474)

Trump Action: In December 2025, Trump’s CMS went even further than Project 2025 and released two proposed rules to restrict access to gender-affirming care. One rule would bar federal Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) funding from going towards gender-affirming care for individuals under the age of 18. The other regulation would go even further, barring hospitals that participate in Medicare and Medicaid from providing gender-affirming care to anyone under the age of 18—forcing hospitals to decide whether to stop providing necessary and life-saving care or lose federal funding.

  1.  Project 2025: Presidential Transition Project, Dans P and Groves S, eds., Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation, 2023, https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf. Page numbers for subsequent Project 2025 citations will be provided in parentheses.

     

References

  1.  Project 2025: Presidential Transition Project, Dans P and Groves S, eds., Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation, 2023, https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf. Page numbers for subsequent Project 2025 citations will be provided in parentheses.

     

Acknowledgments

Anna Bernstein, Amy Friedrich-Karnik and Samira Damavandi. It was edited by Ian Lague.

Share

Reproductive rights are under attack. Will you help us fight back with facts?

Donate

Read More

Resource

Interactive Map: US Abortion Policies and Access After Roe

Initiative

Monthly Abortion Provision Study

Topic

Abortion in the United States

Policy Analysis

State Policy Trends 2025 Full-Year Analysis

Policy Analysis

Six Months In: How the Trump Administration Is Undermining Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Globally

Report

Stability in the Number of Abortions from 2023 to 2024 in US States Without Total Bans Masks Major Shifts in Access

Policy Analysis

Mifepristone for Abortion in a Global Context: Safe, Effective and Approved in Nearly 100 Countries

Policy Analysis

The War on Mifepristone: How Junk Science and False Narratives Threaten US Abortion Access

Policy Analysis

New Federal Medicaid Cuts Will Devastate Coverage for Reproductive Health Care

Topic

United States

  • Abortion
  • Contraception: Publicly Funded Family Planning

Geography

  • Northern America: United States

Tags

medication abortion, birth control, Global Gag Rule, Medicaid
Guttmacher Institute

Center facts. Shape policy.
Advance sexual and reproductive rights.®

Donate Now
Newsletter Signup  Contact Us 
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Contact

Footer

  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
© 2026 Guttmacher Institute. The Guttmacher Institute is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization under the tax identification number 13-2890727. Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent allowable.